Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | |
---|---|---|---|
2013-09-01 | GnuTLS website moves | Phil Pennock | |
2012-12-20 | GnuTLS-FAQ: typo fixes & glitch re standard primes | Phil Pennock | |
Mostly typos. Was one instance of "which a future release of Exim will probably support" which should already have been "which Exim now supports". Doh. Fixed too. | |||
2012-05-30 | Revert "Lower EXIM_CLIENT_DH_MIN_BITS 1024 -> 512."exim-4_80 | Phil Pennock | |
This reverts commit 83f4c7515f3eb06dc070e78edd2694c1d088e5fd. This was not a new check! The call to gnutls_dh_set_prime_bits() was made with DH_BITS in Exim 4.77, so the only difference is that now an administrator can choose at compile time to change the lower bound. So keeping this at 1024 is not a regression and if we can't talk to them now, we couldn't before, and we shouldn't lower security by default. The reverted commit was only acceptable IF it was still better than what we had in Exim 4.77. | |||
2012-05-30 | Lower EXIM_CLIENT_DH_MIN_BITS 1024 -> 512. | Phil Pennock | |
Wolfgang Breyha saw a real-world site using 768 bits. | |||
2012-05-27 | For DH, use standard primes from RFCs | Phil Pennock | |
2012-05-27 | Deal with GnuTLS DH generation overshoot | Phil Pennock | |
2012-05-26 | FAQ for GnuTLS | Phil Pennock | |