2 files changed, 143 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/test/scripts/4000-scanning/4005 b/test/scripts/4000-scanning/4005
index 0095157d1..d251c1a1f 100644
--- a/test/scripts/4000-scanning/4005
+++ b/test/scripts/4000-scanning/4005
@@ -107,4 +107,23 @@ quit
 ****
 #
 #
-# Need to additionally test the timeout / defer_ok case
+#
+#
+server -i 2 DIR/eximdir/clam_sock
+<SCAN
+>LF>scanned_file_name: OK
+<*eof
+****
+#
+exim -odi -bs -DCONTROL="retry=4s"
+ehlo test.ex
+mail from:<>
+rcpt to:<userx@test.ex>
+data
+Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 14:35:01 +0100
+Subject: message should be accepted after a retry
+
+.
+quit
+****
+#
diff --git a/test/scripts/4000-scanning/4009 b/test/scripts/4000-scanning/4009
index 8e34c9802..4c2ab81c6 100644
--- a/test/scripts/4000-scanning/4009
+++ b/test/scripts/4000-scanning/4009
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
 # content scan interface: spamassassin
+#
+# A good-comms test, returning not-spam.
+# (we could use a second one that returns is-spam...)
 server 7833
 <REPORT SPAMC
 <User:
@@ -53,3 +56,123 @@ test
 .
 quit
 ****
+#
+#
+#
+#
+# Server spec line with timeout option, not exercised
+# (could we cut down the massive content?)
+server 7833
+<REPORT SPAMC
+<User:
+<Content-length:
+<
+<From 
+<X-Envelope-From
+<X-Envelope-To
+<Received: 
+<	by 
+<	(envelope
+<	id 
+<	for 
+<Content-type: text/plain
+<Message-Id:
+<From:
+<Date:
+<
+<test
+>SPAMD/1.1 0 EX_OK
+>Spam: False ; 4.5 / 5.0
+>
+>Spam detection software, running on the system "demo",
+>has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
+>message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
+>similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
+>@@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
+>
+>Content preview:  test [...] 
+>
+>Content analysis details:   (4.5 points, 5.0 required)
+>
+> pts rule name              description
+>---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
+>-1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
+> 1.2 MISSING_HEADERS        Missing To: header
+> 1.0 MISSING_FROM           Missing From: header
+> 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT        Missing Subject: header
+> 1.4 MISSING_DATE           Missing Date: header
+> 0.1 MISSING_MID            Missing Message-Id: header
+>
+*eof
+****
+exim -odi -bs -DOPT='retry=10s'
+ehlo test.ex
+mail from:<>
+rcpt to:<userx@test.ex>
+data
+Content-type: text/plain
+
+test
+.
+quit
+****
+#
+#
+#
+# Server spec line with timeout option, exercised
+server -i 2 7833
+<REPORT SPAMC
+<User:
+<Content-length:
+<
+<From 
+<X-Envelope-From
+<X-Envelope-To
+<Received: 
+<	by 
+<	(envelope
+<	id 
+<	for 
+<Content-type: text/plain
+<Message-Id:
+<From:
+<Date:
+<
+<test
+>SPAMD/1.1 0 EX_OK
+>Spam: False ; 4.5 / 5.0
+>
+>Spam detection software, running on the system "demo",
+>has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
+>message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
+>similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
+>@@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
+>
+>Content preview:  test [...] 
+>
+>Content analysis details:   (4.5 points, 5.0 required)
+>
+> pts rule name              description
+>---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
+>-1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
+> 1.2 MISSING_HEADERS        Missing To: header
+> 1.0 MISSING_FROM           Missing From: header
+> 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT        Missing Subject: header
+> 1.4 MISSING_DATE           Missing Date: header
+> 0.1 MISSING_MID            Missing Message-Id: header
+>
+*eof
+****
+exim -odi -bs -DOPT='retry=4s'
+ehlo test.ex
+mail from:<>
+rcpt to:<userx@test.ex>
+data
+Content-type: text/plain
+
+test
+.
+quit
+****
+#
+#