summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--doc/doc-misc/WishList10
-rw-r--r--doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog10
-rw-r--r--src/src/configure.default49
3 files changed, 35 insertions, 34 deletions
diff --git a/doc/doc-misc/WishList b/doc/doc-misc/WishList
index bd618be74..1fbe547bf 100644
--- a/doc/doc-misc/WishList
+++ b/doc/doc-misc/WishList
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-$Cambridge: exim/doc/doc-misc/WishList,v 1.52 2005/10/10 08:23:44 ph10 Exp $
+$Cambridge: exim/doc/doc-misc/WishList,v 1.53 2005/10/11 09:30:41 ph10 Exp $
EXIM 4 WISH LIST
----------------
@@ -1928,14 +1928,6 @@ This is probably a longish-term thing at the moment. Quotas over 2G are now
supported, but not individual messages; no doubt one day this will be wanted.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-(335) 14-Jun-05 T Re-arrange default configuration
-
-A small niggle which might be worth fixing is the ordering of the ACL in the
-default configuration file. The relay_from_hosts and authenticated clauses
-would be better off before the dnslists examples. However, this should be left
-until a x.x0 release, because of the documentation implications.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
(336) 16-Jun-05 M Show recipient(s) after header check failure
The mainlog line for "There is no valid sender in any header line" shows the
diff --git a/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog b/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog
index 48cd6b2a3..ce07ecec2 100644
--- a/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog
+++ b/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog
@@ -1,8 +1,16 @@
-$Cambridge: exim/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog,v 1.245 2005/10/04 08:54:33 ph10 Exp $
+$Cambridge: exim/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog,v 1.246 2005/10/11 09:30:41 ph10 Exp $
Change log file for Exim from version 4.21
-------------------------------------------
+Exim version 4.60
+-----------------
+
+PH/01 In the default runtime configuration, move the checks for
+ relay_from_hosts and authenticated clients from after to before the
+ (commented out) DNS black list checks.
+
+
Exim version 4.54
-----------------
diff --git a/src/src/configure.default b/src/src/configure.default
index da3f99601..0a10ee9b9 100644
--- a/src/src/configure.default
+++ b/src/src/configure.default
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# $Cambridge: exim/src/src/configure.default,v 1.3 2005/05/10 14:48:07 ph10 Exp $
+# $Cambridge: exim/src/src/configure.default,v 1.4 2005/10/11 09:30:41 ph10 Exp $
######################################################################
# Runtime configuration file for Exim #
@@ -310,11 +310,29 @@ acl_check_rcpt:
require verify = sender
+ # Accept if the message comes from one of the hosts for which we are an
+ # outgoing relay. Recipient verification is omitted here, because in many
+ # cases the clients are dumb MUAs that don't cope well with SMTP error
+ # responses. If you are actually relaying out from MTAs, you should probably
+ # add recipient verification here. Note that, by putting this test before
+ # any DNS black list checks, you will always accept from these hosts, even
+ # if they end up on a black list. The assumption is that they are your
+ # friends, and if they get onto a black list, it is a mistake.
+
+ accept hosts = +relay_from_hosts
+
+ # Accept if the message arrived over an authenticated connection, from
+ # any host. Again, these messages are usually from MUAs, so recipient
+ # verification is omitted. And again, we do this check before any black list
+ # tests.
+
+ accept authenticated = *
+
#############################################################################
- # There are no checks on DNS "black" lists because the domains that contain
- # these lists are changing all the time. However, here are two examples of
- # how you could get Exim to perform a DNS black list lookup at this point.
- # The first one denies, while the second just warns.
+ # There are no default checks on DNS black lists because the domains that
+ # contain these lists are changing all the time. However, here are two
+ # examples of how you can get Exim to perform a DNS black list lookup at this
+ # point. The first one denies, whereas the second just warns.
#
# deny message = rejected because $sender_host_address is in a black list at $dnslist_domain\n$dnslist_text
# dnslists = black.list.example
@@ -344,30 +362,13 @@ acl_check_rcpt:
endpass
verify = recipient
- # Accept if the address is in a domain for which we are relaying, but again,
- # only if the recipient can be verified.
+ # Accept if the address is in a domain for which we are an incoming relay,
+ # but again, only if the recipient can be verified.
accept domains = +relay_to_domains
endpass
verify = recipient
- # If control reaches this point, the domain is neither in +local_domains
- # nor in +relay_to_domains.
-
- # Accept if the message comes from one of the hosts for which we are an
- # outgoing relay. Recipient verification is omitted here, because in many
- # cases the clients are dumb MUAs that don't cope well with SMTP error
- # responses. If you are actually relaying out from MTAs, you should probably
- # add recipient verification here.
-
- accept hosts = +relay_from_hosts
-
- # Accept if the message arrived over an authenticated connection, from
- # any host. Again, these messages are usually from MUAs, so recipient
- # verification is omitted.
-
- accept authenticated = *
-
# Reaching the end of the ACL causes a "deny", but we might as well give
# an explicit message.