summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/configs/config.samples/F001
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPhilip Hazel <ph10@hermes.cam.ac.uk>2004-10-08 10:50:49 +0000
committerPhilip Hazel <ph10@hermes.cam.ac.uk>2004-10-08 10:50:49 +0000
commite0f3765aeecd3116bb4171bd0c5f9b609e7c0588 (patch)
tree0a111f6cbeb170d64825aba3bcc2a8e9a549d18c /configs/config.samples/F001
parente05f33e0b79c14608757a60f2f3f8588008355f7 (diff)
Start
Diffstat (limited to 'configs/config.samples/F001')
-rw-r--r--configs/config.samples/F00135
1 files changed, 35 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/configs/config.samples/F001 b/configs/config.samples/F001
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..fd219549f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/configs/config.samples/F001
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+From: Ephraim Silverberg <ephraim@cs.huji.ac.il>
+Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 12:55:55 +0200
+
+We're using Exim 1.82 and have written a message filter to intercept spam
+messages that RBL doesn't catch. Since we have met with reasonable success
+since installing (and refining) the filter -- 566 genuine spam messages
+intercepted during a time period where there were 67 RBL rejections -- I
+thought that the rest of the list may be interested in reviewing our filter
+as a starting point for their own system message filter.
+
+There are a number of caveats, however:
+
+1. The suspected spam is not automatically rejected as RBL hosts are, but
+ is saved to a folder that should be read/writable by the mail
+ administrators. The reason for this is that the filter catches also
+ some legitimate mail and these messages should be bounced to their
+ originally intended recipient(s) (ala X-Envelope-To:) and the filter
+ refined and/or the databases (described below) updated.
+
+2. My filter traps blank/non-existent To: lines as well as To: lines
+ contained in From: lines, but firsts exempts the following categories
+ from this check: mailing lists, local mail, mail originating in the
+ country (e.g. in our case *.il) and mail coming from autosupport servers.
+
+Beyond implicit checks, it uses four DBM databases: two that exempt the
+message from any spam (beyond RBL) checks (software servers and strange mailing
+lists need to be here) -- one based on $sender_address and the other on
+$header_to: lines -- and, conversely, two databases for known spammers that
+have valid mail headers that aren't caught by implicit checks. All entries
+in these databases are lowercase so that we don't need two lines for
+'friend@public.com' and 'Friend@Public.com'.
+
+The sample filter package is at ftp://ftp.cs.huji.ac.il/pub/exim/spam_filter/
+
+Comments and suggestions are welcome.