summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPhilip Hazel <ph10@hermes.cam.ac.uk>2006-02-14 15:11:43 +0000
committerPhilip Hazel <ph10@hermes.cam.ac.uk>2006-02-14 15:11:43 +0000
commit2cbb4081528ed0f71b474f88cf36a55fb0717863 (patch)
tree374e11adc4c54d163dcb3065fe6bad6d586b3726
parent278c6e6cc2394271726a444eecc97cd9b25596e2 (diff)
Remove obsolete commented-out code from receive.c.
-rw-r--r--doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog6
-rw-r--r--src/src/receive.c51
2 files changed, 15 insertions, 42 deletions
diff --git a/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog b/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog
index ce179b7d5..f23bd7e04 100644
--- a/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog
+++ b/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-$Cambridge: exim/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog,v 1.299 2006/02/14 14:55:37 ph10 Exp $
+$Cambridge: exim/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog,v 1.300 2006/02/14 15:11:43 ph10 Exp $
Change log file for Exim from version 4.21
-------------------------------------------
@@ -162,6 +162,10 @@ PH/30 Fix eximon buffer overflow bug (Bugzilla #73).
PH/31 Added sender_verify_fail logging option.
+PH/32 In November 2003, the code in Exim that added an empty Bcc: header when
+ needed by RFC 822 but not by RFC 2822 was commented out. I have now
+ tidied the source and removed it altogether.
+
Exim version 4.60
-----------------
diff --git a/src/src/receive.c b/src/src/receive.c
index 221a4b69d..e11c96df1 100644
--- a/src/src/receive.c
+++ b/src/src/receive.c
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* $Cambridge: exim/src/src/receive.c,v 1.25 2006/02/07 11:19:00 ph10 Exp $ */
+/* $Cambridge: exim/src/src/receive.c,v 1.26 2006/02/14 15:11:43 ph10 Exp $ */
/*************************************************
* Exim - an Internet mail transport agent *
@@ -1284,12 +1284,7 @@ uschar *smtp_reply = NULL;
header_line *h, *next;
-/* Flags for noting the existence of certain headers */
-
-/**** No longer check for these (Nov 2003)
-BOOL to_or_cc_header_exists = FALSE;
-BOOL bcc_header_exists = FALSE;
-****/
+/* Flags for noting the existence of certain headers (only one left) */
BOOL date_header_exists = FALSE;
@@ -1852,24 +1847,12 @@ for (h = header_list->next; h != NULL; h = h->next)
switch (header_checkname(h, is_resent))
{
- /* "Bcc:" gets flagged, and its existence noted, whether it's resent- or
- not. */
-
case htype_bcc:
- h->type = htype_bcc;
- /****
- bcc_header_exists = TRUE;
- ****/
+ h->type = htype_bcc; /* Both Bcc: and Resent-Bcc: */
break;
- /* "Cc:" gets flagged, and the existence of a recipient header is noted,
- whether it's resent- or not. */
-
case htype_cc:
- h->type = htype_cc;
- /****
- to_or_cc_header_exists = TRUE;
- ****/
+ h->type = htype_cc; /* Both Cc: and Resent-Cc: */
break;
/* Record whether a Date: or Resent-Date: header exists, as appropriate. */
@@ -2150,13 +2133,7 @@ if (extract_recip)
will be kept on the spool, but not transmitted as part of the
message. */
- if (h->type == htype_bcc)
- {
- h->type = htype_old;
- /****
- bcc_header_exists = FALSE;
- ****/
- }
+ if (h->type == htype_bcc) h->type = htype_old;
} /* For appropriate header line */
} /* For each header line */
@@ -2561,23 +2538,15 @@ for (h = header_list->next; h != NULL; h = h->next)
/* An RFC 822 (sic) message is not legal unless it has at least one of "to",
-"cc", or "bcc". Note that although the minimal examples in RFC822 show just
+"cc", or "bcc". Note that although the minimal examples in RFC 822 show just
"to" or "bcc", the full syntax spec allows "cc" as well. If any resent- header
exists, this applies to the set of resent- headers rather than the normal set.
-The requirement for a recipient header has been removed in RFC 2822. Earlier
-versions of Exim added a To: header for locally submitted messages, and an
-empty Bcc: header for others or when always_bcc was set. In the light of the
-changes in RFC 2822, we now always add Bcc: just in case there are still MTAs
-out there that insist on the RFC 822 syntax.
-
-November 2003: While generally revising what Exim does to fix up headers, it
-seems like a good time to remove this altogether. */
+The requirement for a recipient header has been removed in RFC 2822. At this
+point in the code, earlier versions of Exim added a To: header for locally
+submitted messages, and an empty Bcc: header for others. In the light of the
+changes in RFC 2822, this was dropped in November 2003. */
-/******
-if (!to_or_cc_header_exists && !bcc_header_exists)
- header_add(htype_bcc, "Bcc:\n");
-******/
/* If there is no date header, generate one if the message originates locally
(i.e. not over TCP/IP) and suppress_local_fixups is not set, or if the